When in april 1912 the first stamps with the portrait of the new king Albert 1 where sold, it was not
a great success, everybody complained about the mediocrity of the quality and the bad portrait of the king.
It was stamp nr 111 of 10 c who came out first, and departing september stamp nr 123 of 25 c with an
adapted portrait, but this was not much better. The complete ''Pellens" set consists of twelve stamps
of which nine with the portrait of king Albert 1. Therefore work was started immediately on the preparation of a new set of thirteen stamps, of which also nine with the portrait of the king; This would be the most used stamps namely from 1 cent until 40 cents. The other stamps of the set would become much greater, like the ''Vloors'' type,who where still in use. -The highest value , the 5 fr, would remember the Belgian dynasty,namely the portrait of king Albert 1, in medaillon, framed by the portraits of king Leopold 1 and 2. -With the 2 fr one would commemorate a great economical fact of the century; The occupation of Congo: an officer repells an Arabic slave driver for the Belgian flag, while a slave shows his ruptured chains and a negro woman shows her liberated child. -The 1 fr would commemorate the opening of the river Scheldt.On the forplan one sees the port of Antwerp, while on the horizon a ship sails by with the inscription in two languages: ' the Scheldt liberated '. -The stamp of 50 c would commemorate our nationale independence: a volunteer of the war against The Netherlands of 1830, dressed in a blouse, falls wounded while he passes the tricoulored flag to another combattant.This was an evocation of the death of count Fréderic de Mérode,deathly wounded in Berchem in 1830. During the preparations for these set of stamps, war broke out and the work was interrupted. The Red Cross of Belgium was mobilised and prepared itself to do its duty. To meet the financial needs of this organisation, the government decided to the publication of a set of stamps with an additional charge to support its humanitary works. An ministerial arrest was published on 30/9/1914 and allowed the making of stamps of a type that was already in preparation and the manufacturing was granted to a private printing-office in Antwerp,while the production factory of stamps in Malines was not available. Because the purpose of the 50 c stamp was to commemorate the patriotism of the nation, it was entirely fit for the purpose,and the decision was taken to make a new set consisting of three stamps. And this was the start of the set " Red Cross de Mérode." |
|
GENERAL |
|
Type: statue de Mérode Design:Mac Donald Printing : Lithografie by J.Verschueren Antwerp First day issue:saturday 3/10/1914 Perforation: 14 or unperforated Sheet: 75 stamps in three panels of 25 stamps End of use:14/8/1920 Postage: only valid for domestic use Remains: burned in stamp printing miil Mechelen 1928 |
5c: |
600.000 |
|
10c: |
600.000 |
|
20c: |
75.000 |
5c: |
23.214 |
|
10c: |
14.650 |
|
20c: |
8.663 |
5c: |
24.000 |
|
10c: |
30.000 |
|
20c: |
12.000 |
5c: |
150.000 |
|
10c: |
150.000 |
|
20c: |
50.000 |
5c: |
1305 |
|
10c: |
2065 |
|
20c: |
536 |
Sheets of five centimes: |
colour of the cross is green. |
|
Sheets of ten centimes: |
colour of the cross is red. |
|
Sheets of twenty centimes: |
colour of the cross is purple. |
WHOLE SHEET
Here we try to make a reconstruction of the dimensions of the whole sheet using an article by Soebert, published in: ''Le revue du collectionneur-spécialiste'' page 206-207. At first we will remark that differences can occur in the width of the sheets for three reasons: |
1) The paper used for printing was cut from a longer sheet (or role?)
what can give aberrations. 2) During the printing the position of the sheets on the printing machine can be slightly different, and the panels are not always placed on the same place, which also can give aberrations. 3) The imprinted sheets are put together and cut in pieces, but the sheets underneath can shift which also produces aberrations. |
|
In this article we find the following picture: |
This picture represents a part of a sheet called ''waste of printing'',a sheet who had already been printed with stamps of the serie little Albert, and was used a second time when putting in operation the printing machine.Apparently this machine needed a few times of printing, before producing perfect stamps, wherefore one used sheets who were already printed ( and rejected?) to economise paper. Whe have here a part of panel two and of panel three of the 5 c de Mérode stamp, with an interpanel distance of 3,6 cm. Now we give some measurements of the complete panels in our possession. -5 c panel 1 Left margin: 14 mm three times, 13 mm two times. Right margin: 14 mm three times, 13 mm two times. Total width of the panel: 16,2 cm five times,with a width of the stamps of 13,4 cm each time. -5 c panel 2 Left margin: 14 mm six times, 13 mm once, 11 mm once. Right margin: 14 mm four times, 13 mm three times, 11 mm once. Total width of the panels: 16,2 cm seven times, 16,6 cm once, with a width of the stamps of 13,4 cm each time. -5 c panel 3 Left margin: 12 mm once, 13 twice, 14 mm five times, 15 mm once. Right margin: 13 mm seven timres, 14 mm once, 15 mm once, 19 mm once, 21 mm once. Total width of the panels: 16,1 cm three times, 16,2 cm six times, 16,6 cm two times, with a width of the stamps of 13,4 cm each time. Starting with a maximal width of the left margin of panel 1 of 1,4 cm,a width of the stamps of three times 13,4 cm, an interpanel distance of two times 3,6 cm and a maximal width of the right margin of panel three of 2,1 cm we can make the following calculation: 1,4+13,4+3,6+13,4+3,6+13,4+2,1 =50,90 cm. Now follows the same measurements and the same calculation for the 10 c. Striking are the differences between the panels.Apparently the panels were not cut equaly. -10 c panel 1 Left margin: 13 mm two times, 16 mm five times, 17 mm once. Right margin: 12 mm once, 13 mm five times, 14 mm once, 15 mm once. Total width of the panels: 15,9 mm once, 16,3 mm five times, 16,4 mm once, 16,5 mm once. Total width of the stamps 13,4 cm each time. -10 c panel 2 Left margin: 14 mm four times, 15 mm seven times. Right margin: 11 mm three times, 14 mm seven times, 16 mm once. Total width of the panels: 16,3 mm ten times,16,4 cm once, with a width of the stamps of 13,4 cm each time. -10 c panel 3 Left margin:14 mm once, 15 mm once, 16 mm six times. Right margin: 13 mm six times, 14 mm once, 15 mm once. Total width of the panels: 16,3 cm seven times, 16,4 cm once, with a total width of the stamps 13,4 cm. Starting with a maximal width of the left margin of panel 1of 1,7 cm, a width of the stamps of three times 13,4 cm, an interpanel distance of two times 3,6 cm, and a maximal width of the right margin of panel three of 1,5 cm we can make the following calculation: 1,7+13,4+3,6+13,4+3,6+13,4+1,5=50,60 cm. Now we give the measurements of the 20 c whole sheets in our possession: -20 c panel 2 Left margin: 15 mm. Right margin: 15 mm. Total width of the panel 16,4 cm -20 c panel 3 Left margin:15 mm Right margin :15 mm Total width of the panel 16,4 mm Here we can make the same calculation:Left margin panel 1 1,5 cm, two times the Interpanel distance of 3,6 cm, three times the width of the stamps of 13,4 cm and the right margin of panel 3 of 1,5 cm. 1,5+13,4+3,6+13,4+3,6+13,4+1,5 =50,40 cm. Now we give an example of another part of 'waste of printing'with a different position of the Mérode stamp 20 c accordingly to the 5 c Little Albert. Apparently the stamps were produced in several times, first a part of Mérode stamps and Little Albert stamps to cope the need of 3/10/1914 first day of appearance.Later another number of stamps was produced to cope the intended number of circulation while the printing was still going on the 7/10/1914 at the beginning of the shelling of Antwerp. |
AFBEELDING 1 Number 1 in the right under corner. Dimensions of the paper : 20,5 cm --22,5 cm. of the drawing : 10,4 cm--13,7 cm Charcoal or greasy pencil on drawing paper. Compostion: several triangles. Piéta-like composition.. In this drawing four figures are visible: - carrier of the flag - soldier with a gun looking at soldiers(standing en and lying down) in the right under corner - count de Mérode. - not-well-drawn figure which supports the count de Mérode. Remarkably is the contrast light-dark between the figures to put forward the main figure.We can decide that this is a composition-, perspective-,and contrast study. |
|
AFBEELDING 2
Number 2 in the right under corner. Dimensions of the paper : 20,1 cm--24,6 cm. of the drawing : 10,3 cm--13,5 cm. Pencil drawing on drawing paper. Here also four figures are visible: - carrier of the flag who looks down at the count. - soldier with a gun. - count de Mérode who sits more upright than in afbeelding 2. - more clearly drawn fourth figure. is |
|
AFBEELDING 3 Two drawings placed on one paper. Dimensions of the paper : 22 cm--28 cm of the drawing at the top : 10,1 cm--11 cm at the bottom : 11 cm--12 cm Pencil drawing on thick paper. Little drawings with details in the right margin. The drawing on the top is placed upon another, which looks like afbeelding 1 and 2. |
|
AFBEELDING 4 Complete design of the stamp. Dimensions of the paper: 16 cm--13,1 cm of the drawing : 14,6 cm--16,1 cm. Pen drawing and brush in East-Indian inkt on cartboard. In the margins little holes, placed at random, caused by neadles? Little pencil lines are visible for example in the shields with the numbers, and also in the numbers themselves. |
|
|
AFBEELDING 5 Photocopie ? Remarkable: left 50 centimen: right 50 centimes |
AFBEELDING 6 Thick cardboard. Dimensions of the paper : 16,5 cm-- 21 cm. of the drawing : 11 cm--13,3 cm. Pen drawing and brush. Cut-out medaillon. In the margins little holes from needles and little pencil lines for example in the numbers. |
|
AFBEELDING 7 Thick cardboard. Dimensions of the paper : 16,1 cm--21 cm. of the drawing : 9,9 cm-- 12 cm. Further identical to afbeelding 6. |
|
Concerning afbeelding 1,2 and 3 we can ask ourself the following question: are these really drawings made by Mac Donald ? Why would he make composition and light studies with even four figures when he could have taken the statue at Berchem as an example. Whas it his purpose to use another image for the stamps? Or are these drawings made by Josué Dupon as designs for the statue itself ? Who will give us the answers ? |
Since the introduction of perforated stamps, it was the custom to make a sheet of 50 or 100 stamps, who where
send to the ministery of railroad, post and telegraphie. These stamps where not ment to be sold to the public,
and none of them where even sold in a post-office.They were ment as a gift by the minister to official persons,
who received one example each; But it happened that some of these stamps were given to colllectors,who sold the
stamps.
|
In 1929 one has made a reprint from the 50 c de Mérode stamp on a minister sheet, departing from an at that time still existing original mother plate .
The reason for doing this could be a question from postmuseums in other countries to obtain facsimiles of Belgian stamps to complete their collection. A minister sheet is a sheet of paper of 150 x 175 mm provided with a special mark in the right edge below (spectators view) which says: Ministère de chemins de fer, Marines, postes et télégraphes Ministerie van spoorwegen, zeewezen, posterijen en telegrafie. These sheets were numbered from 1 to 18 in the left upper corner and were ment to be given to the king, his family and his ministers, whereby the king received the number one, and the other in order of importance. There exist also sheets without a number. Departing the first stamps of Belgium, these minister sheets where made (exept the war years 1914-1918 and 1940-1945.) Characteristics of the stamp shown are: 1) the stamp was rejected at the last moment because of an error in the writing of the Dutch word ' centiemen'. 2) The position of the group of figures is positioned to the right. 3) The printing of the stamp is surrounded with cloudes in the background. |
During the decades we have collected and studied these stamps, especially the de Mérode stamps, we were always surprised to see how many
forgeries were presented by traders and on (even well-established ) auctions. Even the relatively easy detectible false stamps with closed
Q in the word BELGIQUE are presented as being authentic , and referred by as " the second print of Antwerp, while those forgeries with
open Q are referred to as "the third print of Antwerp". |
What is the reason for all this? There are so little authentic stamps that traiders can't offer them in sufficient quantities to cope the buyers. - A lot of collectors are to quickly satisfied and want simply to fill in the preprinted frames in their albums without searching themselves for the authentic stamps. . |
Why are the two forgeries not real stamps and how do we obtain the criteria to say that the stamps are authentic ? 1) Only stamps, printed with the original lithografic stones under control of representatives of the Belgian postal autorities, and ment to serve as payment for postal services, are authentic stamps. They were send to the different postal offices and used on authentic stamped envelopes. Furthermore an additional charge per stamp was committed to the Red Cross. 2) To obtain the criteria for distinguishing the real stamps from the forgeries, we depart from letters who have really been posted and delivered. Hereby we take notice of all the verifiable details of the letter to establish the authenticity of the letter and therefore of the stamps put on it. Using the characteristics of the authentic stamps as described by Vervisch and co, we can inspect each single stamp and put forward new characteristics like gum, placing of the stamps in the sheet etc. Using these principles one can recognise without any doubt the real stamps, exception made for the 10 c little Albert. Now we give THE INSPECTION - TREE FOR DE DE MÉRODE STAMP |
Sheet reconstruction Reconstruction of the sheets by using minimal differences in the stamps to determine the position of every stamp in the sheet. Way of working: |
|
1)Search the slight defects on the stamp. 2) Is this a constant defect? This means: are the defects accidental or do they repeat themselves on each stamp on the same place. 3)Determination of the position of the stamp by using paires,strips,corner stamps. On the de Merode set, the 5 c and the 20 c where printed in two different editions. In each of the colours one can find constant defects. The red crosses of the 5 c and 20 c are printed with the same lithografic stone,so when we find a red-coloured constant defect on the 5 c,this also must be found on the 20 c in the same place. Using this method we can determine the position of the stamps of the 20 c, starting from a known defect of the 5 c. But several defects came into being during the printing, and are therefore not found on both values. For example the variety "red rectangle" is only found on the 5 c, so the 20 c was printed first, and later a ' scratch ' was made by manipulating the stone with the red crosses. |
AUTHENTIC 5 c DE MÉRODE : SIZE OF THE STAMPS. |
||
PANEL 1 : | - Thirteen stamps - large size 3,45 cm : nrs 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 , 15. Code in the drawing. |
|
- Eleven stamps
medium size 3,43 cm nrs 4, 5, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24 en 25. Code in the drawing - One stamp small size 3,41 cm nr 20. Code in the drawing |
||
PANEL 2 : | - Twelve stamps large
size 3,45 cm nrs 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15. Code in the drawing |
|
- Nine stamps
medium size 3,43 cm nrs 1, 6, 12, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24 en 25. Code in the drawing - Four stamps small size 3,41 cm nrs 16, 17, 21 en 22. Code in the drawing. |
||
PANEL 3 : | - Fifteen stamps large
size 3,45 cm nrs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 en 15. Code in the drawing |
|
- Ten stamps
medium size 3,43 cm nrs 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,21, 22, 23, 24, 25. Code in the drawing. |
||
DISCUSSION IN DETAIL. Panel 1 position 3 and 4. The stamp on position 4 is shorter. Furthermore the print left behind by one of the original motherplates on the lithografique stone is sloping in position four in comparison with position 3. Panel 1 position 14. Position 14 is a large size stamp. A complete sheet (of three panels) stamps of the real 5 c de Mérode has 40 stamps large size. Remarque: two different motherplates large size have been used for the compilation of the lithografique stone 5 c, namely: - one original motherplate with green point on the costume (type 1). - one original motherplate without the point on the costume (type 2). On a complete sheet of the 5 c one finds fourty stamps large size comprehensing seventeen of type 1 and twentythree of type 2. PANEL 1 position 20. |
||
1) | Panel 1 has only
one Mérode 5 c of small size, in position 20 (height 3,41 cm). Panel 2 has four stamps small size (position 16,17,21 and 22). Panel 3 has none. |
|
2) | These five copies have been put on the lithografique stone using only one original motherplate.Indeed, these five stamps have the same hight,
but also they all have a point on the costume of the Mérode and they all have the left 5 stained with spots. During the elaboration of the stone, or during the printing proces, varieties have appeared, which enables us to differ these five stamps one another. The original motherplate small size has thus been used five times. |
|
PANEL 2 positions 17 and 18. Position 17 : small size (3,41 cm). Position 18 : medium size (3,43 cm). The difference in height is 0,2 mm , which is easely measurable and visible on sight. Two original motherplates have been used for the realisation of the lithografique stone : - an original motherplate with a point on the costume (type 1). - an original motherplate without a point on the costume (type 2). On a whole sheet of the 5 c one finds 30 stamps of medium size, of which 15 are of type 1 and 15 of type 2. CONCLUSIONS |
||
1) | The placing
of the large,medium and small size stamps in a whole sheet is completely
at random and doesn't match any mathematic sequence. These completely at random placing is one of the mysteries of the studie of the making of the lithografique stone of the de Mérode stamp. |
|
2) | We can also
make the notice that stamps of small size always have been placed next
to stamps of medium size and never next to stamps of large size. Between
large and small size stamps, the elaborator of the stone has put stamps
of medium size. So the completely at random placing of the different sizes
is ment to be by the elaborator. The difference between the height of the
large and small sized stamps is 0,4 mm. If one had placed a stamp of size
3,45 cm next to a stamp of size 3,41 cm, the difference would be to striking.
The aesthetic view of the panels would have been sufferd by doing this. |
|
3) | The different motherplates used for the making of the lithografique stone were single, thus 75 copies were placed the one after the other on the lithografique stone. | |
AUTHENTIC 5 c de MÉRODE : The point on the costume of count de Mérode. |
||
Type 1 : On a whole sheet of the authentic 5 c de Mérode we find 37 stamps out of 75 with a great green point on the costume. | ||
Type 2 : On a whole sheet of the authentic 5 c de Mérode we find 38 stamps on 75 without a point on the costume. | ||
Panel 1 All the 25 stamps of this panel have the point on the costume. This panel is enterily composed of stamps of type 1. Panel 2 Eight stamps of panel 2 are of type 1 (point on the costume), namely positions 1,6,11,12,16,17,21 and 22. Seventheen stamps of panel 2 are of type 2 (no point), namely 2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10,13,14,15,18,19,20,23,24 and 25. Panel 3 Four stamps of panel 3 are of type 1 (point on the costume), namely positions 2,10,15 and 20. Twentyone stamps are of type 2 (no point), namely 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13,14,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25. SYNTHESE VAN "HOOGTE" EN "GROEN PUNT". DE ECHTE 10 C : KLEURPUNT IN DE LINKER MARGE. 24 zegels van de 75 hebben een rood punt in de linker marge, tussen het 2' en het 3' decoratief element (tellend van onder naar boven). 7 zegels in paneel 1. 0 zegels in paneel 2. 17 zegels in paneel 3. DE ECHTE 10 C : DE HOOGTE VAN DE ZEGELS. 2 formaten : - Groot formaat : 3,45 à 3,46 cm - Klein formaat : 3,42 à 3,43 cm. |
||
Paneel 1 : | -
15 zegels groot formaat: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 en 15. |
|
-
10 zegels klein formaat : 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 23, 24 en 25. |
||
Paneel 2 : | = Paneel 1 | |
Paneel 3 : | -
8 zegels groot formaat : 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 13, 14 en 15 |
|
-
17 zegels klein formaat : 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 en 25. |
||
The placing of the large and small size stamps in the third panel is completely at random and doesn't match any mathematical criterium. We notice that we find in a complete sheet of 75 stamps 38 large and 37 small size formats. This placing can't be a coincidence.It is the result of a presupposed plan by Verschueren before the making of the lithografique stone. AUTHENTIC 10 c DE MÉRODE : COLOUR POINT IN THE LEFT MARGIN. 24 stamps out of 75 have a red point in the left margin between the second and third decoratif element ( counting from the bottom to the top). - Seven stamps in panel 1 : 1,6,11,12,16,17,22. - No stamps in panel 2. - Seventeen stamps in panel 3 : 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,17,19,20,23,25. AUTHENTIC 10 c DE MÉRODE : COLOUR POINT IN THE CENTRAL PART OF THE LEFT ARM OF THE U OF BELGIQUE. |
||
Panel 1 : | eleven stamps of the 25 have this point: 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 24 and 25. | |
Paneel 2 : | no stamp has this point. | |
Panel 3 : | six stamps of the 25 have this point :
1, 3, 8, 9, 14 and 24.
|
|
AUTHENTIC 10 c DE MÉRODE : RED COLOUR POINT POSITIONED AGAINST THE LEFT SIDE OF THE MARGIN. |
||
Panel 1 : | no point present | |
Panel 2 : | seven stamps out of 25 have the point : 2, 7, 8, 9, 13, 15 and 22. | |
Panel 3 : | two stamps out of 25 have the point: 16 and 21. | |
THE TWO TYPES OF THE AUTHENTIC 10 c DE MÉRODE. |
||
Type 1 : | Interruption or shrinking
in the white line along the pearls at the left side, between the 1' and
the 2' pearl, beneath the 10 at the left . If this interruption or shrinking is present, we can always find a colour point on the three colourlines in the lower part of the great scroll at the right. |
|
Type 2 : | Neither the interruption/shrinking nor the colour point are present. | |
A whole sheet of the authentical 10 c de Mérode consists of 27 stamps out of 75 type 1. | ||
Panel 1 : | type 1 : 1, 6, 11, 12, 16, 17, 21 en 22. | |
Panel 2 : | volledig type 2. | |
Panel 3 : | type 1: 2, 3,4 ,5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24 en 25. |
Between March 1915 and Oktober 1916 printer Verschueren produced an enormous amount of forgeries. Real
forgeries, while they were not made using the original printing stones. After the beginning of the shelling of Antwerp on 7/10/1914, the printing was stopped, the lithografic stones were destroyed and the remaining paper was burnt in a nearby bakery.But some original autografies and some not-used autografies ( who had defects) remained in the printing-office. Using these Verschueren made new lithographic stones There are two types of forgeries: 1)The forgeries who have the Q in BELGIQUE closed. These are made by using a rejected autografie. 2)The forgeries with the Q in Belgique open, using original autographies wihout defects, also used to make the original stamps. The easiest way to distinguish the real stamps is as follows: 1) Q closed in BELGIQUE: forgerie 2)The four upper lines in the section above the word "BELGIÓ" consist of little squares,who are always clearly visible.The type 2 forgeries has filled up lines. We now give a replication of the booklette : ' The Red Cross stamps of 1914' by the study group of counterfeitings with as president mister Roger Vervisch, which offers an excellent overview of these problems. |
Perforation: | 14 or not-perforated. Perforated stamps have the same characteristics as the non-perforated. | |
Paper: | granular, cream-coloured (5 and 10 cent) or rosy-purple (20 cent). Influenced by light or water the latter becomes cream-coloured. | |
Gum: |
thin, a little bit shining, with little craquelures who form a pattern of sloping strips (the gum of the falsificated stamps is either
lightly cracked with vertical stripes, or cracked very explicit, thick, spread irregular or to shining.) |
|
1. The letters B and E of BELGIQUE don't touch one another. 2. The sloped line at the bottom of the L of BELGIQUE is short. 3. The cedilla in the Q of BELGIQUE is drawn very clearly. It has a different form in all three values. |
||
12
|
4. 5. 6. 7. |
The lines are drawn clearly and regularly and show very little irregularities and interruptions. The form of the curls before and after BELGIQUE is different in all the three values. In general the crosses have right angles and the compact pale-red colour covers the whole surface very well, without lacks or crackx. Concerning the 10 cent the cross is printed in the same colour of the rest of the stamp. The four upper lines in the section with the words BELGIË consists in fact of little squares, visible even in the thick-printed stamps. The false stamps have full lines. |
|||
13
The genuine 5 centime. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. |
The descending line of the left 5 is slightly bend and thinner on the upper side but not broken. Enlarging the right scroll of this figure, we can see one, two or sometimes more points. The foot is also thinner but not broken. BELGIQUE in the middle of the section. The leaf above the first E of BELGIQUE is not attached to these letter. The letters E-L and U-E of BELGIQUE touches one-another on the upper and the under side. Second E of BELGIQUE is closed. A white line joins the right upper side of these letter and the scroll before the figure 5. The letters of BELGIË are touching each-other at the foot. |
|
14
The easy falsification of the 5 centime. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. |
The descending line of the left 5 has no thinning. Belgique closer to the upper line of the section. The leaf above the first E of BELGIQUE almost touches this letter. The stand -up line of the L of BELGIQUE is too long. Q of BELGIQUE has no cedilla, is in fact an O. The second E of BELGIQUE and the scroll before the 5 are not attached one-another with a white line. The letters of BELGIË are free from each-other. The shaded lines above and left of BELGIË are not drawn clearly. |
|
15
The dangerous falsification of the 5 centime. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. |
The descending line of the left 5 is broken. The foot is also frequently broken. Shorter or broken line in the volute above the 5 at the right. Bent line almost disappeared in the little circle above right. Printing not-well-done, especially between the legs of the standing figure. The shaded lines above and left of BELGIË not well printed. The rest of the characteristics are the same as the real stamps. |
|
16
The genuine stamp of 10 centime. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
BELGIQUE closer to the top of the section. A leaf almost touches the first E of BELGIQUE. Semi-circular line in the scroll above the L of BELGIQUE. The part of the leaves above the letter Q of BELGIQUE almost forms a straight line. Second E of BELGIQUE is open. Semi-circular line in the scroll above the 10. Two lines or two rows with points (sometimes difficult visible) in the 0 of the 10 at the right. The letters of BELGIË are touching each-other at the bottom. White line under the second E of BELGIË. |
|
17
The easy forgery of the 10 centime. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. |
BELGIQUE in the middle of the section. The leafs are further away from the first E of BELGIQUE. The stand-up-line at the foot of the L of BELGIQUE is too long. Q of BELGIQUE is actually an O. The leave above the U of BELGIQUE has a curly appendix. Second E of BELGIQUE is closed. Scroll before the 10 at the right as by the 5 centime. No white line under the second E of BELGIË. Letters of BELGIË are separated from each other. The shaded lines above and left of BELGIË are not drawn clearly. |
|
18
The dangerous falsification of the 10 centime. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. |
Multiple interruptions in the ribs of the leafs. No line or a barely visible line in the scroll above the L of BELGIQUE. No point or only one point in the 0 of the 10 on the right. No line or an interrupted line in the globe at the top right . Lines in the leafs interrupted (continuous in the real stamps). Printing not-well-done between the legs of the standing figure. The shaded lines above and left of BELGIË not well formed. The rest of the characteristics are the same of these of the real stamps. |
|
19
The real 20 centime. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. |
BELGIQUE closer to the top line of the sector. The letters BEL are closer to the top side than the other letters. 20 at the left: little notch in the scroll of the 2;Little excavation in the ornamental leaf opposite to the beginning of the foot of the 2; Coloured point in the right part of the 0. Only the letters UE of BELGIQUE are touching each other. Second E of BELGIQUE is open. Little coloured point (sometimes barely visible) in the middle of the 0 of the 20 at the right. The line in the scroll to the right of the second E of BELGIQUE is broken in the middle, but not more than that. The beginning of the foot of the 2 in the 20 at the right attaches the scroll or attaches it almost, but the globe-formed extremity of this scroll doesn't touch the 2. The letters of BELGIË are attached one-another. |
|
20
The easy falsification of the 20 centime, type 1. |
|
||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
BELGIQUE in the middle of the section. The beginning of the foot of the 2 at the left doesnt penetrate in the leaf ornament. E and L of BELGIQUE are Touching each-other. The stand-up-line of the L of BELGIQUE is too long. Q of BELGIQUE is an O. Second E of BELGIQUE closed. Scroll before 20 at the right is like the 5 centime. The 2 in the 20 right doesnt touch the scroll. Shaded lines above and left of BELGIË not well-printed. |
|
21
The easy forgery of the 20 centime type 2 and 3. |
|
|||
Same characteristics as the type 1 but: |
|||
|
Type 2: Type 3: |
the 2 at the right touches the globe-shaped extremity of the scroll, but not the base of it. Q of BELGIQUE with cedilla. |
|
22
The dangerous falsification of the 20 centime. |
|
|||
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. |
No point in the 0 or notch in the 2 of the 20 at the right. Ribs of the leafs not well-formed. No point in the 0 of the 20 at the right. The line in the scroll at the right of the E of BELGIQUE is broken in three pieces, is shorter or has disappeared completely. Shaded lines above and left of BELGIË not clearly printed. The other characteristics are the same as these of the real stamps. |
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BAARLE-HERTOG Belgian territory, surrounded by Dutch territory, and therefore inaccessible for the German occupiers,while Netherland stayed neutral in the war. POSTMARK: one circle, crosssection 27,5 mm. Two types:
|
The work done by mister S.Toulieff, Place Matteotti nr 6,
4630 Soumagne, concerning the de Mérode stamps, is very detailed and is a testimony of his
profound knowledge of the matter. His findings about the different types of stamps, his description of the proofs are unique. Therefore we are very proud and grateful that we have received the permission of this excellent philatelist to reproduce his work completely on our site. The following articles come out off the periodical :''World Wars 1914-1918 1939-194, groupe d'Etudes philatéliques des deux guerres mondiales Périodique trimestriel'' . For the moment these publications are only available in French, but we're going to translate them in English as soon as possible. Now some practical information:
Introduction p. 1-4
Le 5 centimes authentique de Mérode p. 5-41. Les caractéristiques d'authenticités p.5-21 Le point dans le costume du comte de Mérode type 1 + 2 p. 22-26 La hauteur p.27-35 Les variétés p.36-41 Le 10 centimes authentique de Mérode p 42-82 Les variétés p.44-48 Reproduction de la planche p.49-63 Type 1 et type 2 p.64-70 Le point de couleur en marge gauche p.71-73 La hauteur des timbres p.74-76 Le point dans la partie gauche centrale du u de Belgique p.77-79 Point de couleur contre la ligne de cadre inférieure p.80-82 Le 50 c de Mérode non émis p.84-122
|
Blad Titel
01 Titel - Plan. 02 Genesis. 03 - 05 Algemene echtheidskenmerken van de zegels. 06 Poststuk. 07 Maakwerk. 08 - 09 Kenmerken van de echte 5 centiem zegels. 10 - 11 De plaatfouten op de 5 centiem zegels - paneel 1. 12 - 13 De plaatfouten op de 5 centiem zegels - paneel 2. 14 - 15 De plaatfouten op de 5 centiem zegels - paneel 3. 16 De officieel erkende plaatfouten (vari-teiten) op de 5 centiem zegels. 17 Kenmerken van de gevaarlijke vervalsing - 5 centiem zegels. 18 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 5 centiem zegels. 19 - 24 Voorbeelden van vervalsingen van de 5 centiem zegels. 25 - 26 Poststuk. 27 - 29 Afstempelingen op de 5 centiem zegels. 30 - 31 Kenmerken van de echte 10 centiem zegels. 32 - 33 De plaatfouten op de 10 centiem zegels - paneel 1. 34 - 35 De plaatfouten op de 10 centiem zegels - paneel 2. 36 - 37 De plaatfouten op de 10 centiem zegels - paneel 3. 38 De plaatfout -kleurpunt in de linkerrand- op de 10 centiem zegels. 39 De plaatfout -kleurpunt in de letter U- op de 10 centiem zegels. 40 De plaatfout -kleurpunt aan de onderste kaderlijn- op de 10 centiem zegels. 41 De officieel erkende plaatfouten (vari-teiten) op de 10 centiem zegels 42 Kenmerken van de gevaarlijke vervalsing - 10 centiem zegels. 43 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 10 centiem zegels. 44 - 48 Voorbeelden van vervalsingen van de 10 centiem zegels. 49 - 51 Afstempelingen op de 10 centiem zegels. 52 Kenmerken van de echte 20 centiem zegels. 53 - 54 De plaatfouten op de 20 centiem zegels. 55 Kenmerken van de gevaarlijke vervalsing - 20 centiem zegels. 56 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 20 centiem zegels - type1. 57 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 20 centiem zegels - type2 58 - 62 Voorbeelden van de grove vervalsing van de 20 centiem zegels. 63 - 64 Afstempelingen op de 20 centiem zegels.
Blad Titel
01 Titel - Plan. 02 Genesis. 03 - 05 Algemene echtheidskenmerken van de zegels. 06 Poststuk. 07 Maakwerk. 08 - 09 Kenmerken van de echte 5 centiem zegels. 10 - 11 De plaatfouten op de 5 centiem zegels - paneel 1. 12 - 13 De plaatfouten op de 5 centiem zegels - paneel 2. 14 - 15 De plaatfouten op de 5 centiem zegels - paneel 3. 16 De officieel erkende plaatfouten (vari-teiten) op de 5 centiem zegels. 17 Kenmerken van de gevaarlijke vervalsing - 5 centiem zegels. 18 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 5 centiem zegels. 19 - 24 Voorbeelden van vervalsingen van de 5 centiem zegels. 25 - 26 Poststuk. 27 - 29 Afstempelingen op de 5 centiem zegels. 30 - 31 Kenmerken van de echte 10 centiem zegels. 32 - 33 De plaatfouten op de 10 centiem zegels - paneel 1. 34 - 35 De plaatfouten op de 10 centiem zegels - paneel 2. 36 - 37 De plaatfouten op de 10 centiem zegels - paneel 3. 38 De plaatfout -kleurpunt in de linkerrand- op de 10 centiem zegels. 39 De plaatfout -kleurpunt in de letter U- op de 10 centiem zegels. 40 De plaatfout -kleurpunt aan de onderste kaderlijn- op de 10 centiem zegels. 41 De officieel erkende plaatfouten (vari-teiten) op de 10 centiem zegels 42 Kenmerken van de gevaarlijke vervalsing - 10 centiem zegels. 43 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 10 centiem zegels. 44 - 48 Voorbeelden van vervalsingen van de 10 centiem zegels. 49 - 51 Afstempelingen op de 10 centiem zegels. 52 Kenmerken van de echte 20 centiem zegels. 53 - 54 De plaatfouten op de 20 centiem zegels. 55 Kenmerken van de gevaarlijke vervalsing - 20 centiem zegels. 56 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 20 centiem zegels - type1. 57 Kenmerken van de grove vervalsing - 20 centiem zegels - type2 58 - 62 Voorbeelden van de grove vervalsing van de 20 centiem zegels. 63 - 64 Afstempelingen op de 20 centiem zegels.
|